JUNE 12, 1863:
One of President Lincoln’s most
celebrated writings was a response to the resolutions approved by a meeting of
Democrats in Albany, New York. The meeting, led by Erastus Corning, the
president of the New York Central Railroad, criticized Lincoln for his
infringements on constitutional liberties in general, and the arrest and trial
of former Representative Clement Vallandigham in particular. Lincoln’s letter
reads in part:
“It undoubtedly was a
well pondered reliance with [the
Southern rebels] that in their own
unrestricted effort to destroy Union, constitution, and law, all together, the
government would, in great degree, be restrained by the same constitution and
law, from arresting their progress…
If I be wrong on this
question of constitutional power, my error lies in believing certain
proceedings are constitutional when, in cases of rebellion or Invasion, the
public Safety requires them, which would not be constitutional when, in absence
of rebellion or invasion, the public Safety does not require them—in other
words, that the constitution is not in its application in all respects the
same, in cases of Rebellion or invasion, involving the public Safety, as it is
in times of profound peace and public security. The Constitution itself makes
the distinction; and I can no more be persuaded that the government can
constitutionally take no strong measure in time of rebellion, because it can be
shown that the same could not be lawfully taken in time of peace, than I can be
persuaded that a particular drug is not good medicine for a sick man, because
it can be shown to not be good food for a well one.”
No comments:
Post a Comment