Wednesday, June 26, 2013

October 11. 1862---"Barbarous" "Cruelty"---Emancipation



OCTOBER 11, 1862:   

The Emancipation Proclamation had a mixed response in the North. Many whites objected to it, while others embraced it. Still others feared that it would prove a great motivator to Southern aspirations. The Danville, Vermont North Star comments on the Southern reaction to the Emancipation Proclamation:

“In another place, we gave a sketch of the debate and contemplated action of the rebel, the Congress on the President’s Emancipation proclamation. It will be seen that they propose severe retaliatory measures, and suggest the policy of raising the “black flag” or the policy of granting no quarter. This, it is truly said, is a game that two can play and if adopted by one party, it will probably be the other, thus adding new horrors to this sanguinary contest. It is to be hoped that neither side will resort to it: but at best, the President’s proclamation, if carried out, will tend greatly to exasperate the enemy, and it is to be feared, will give a barbarous character to the war, which it is hoped might be avoided.

The Richmond Enquirer of October 1…declares ‘[The Emancipation Proclamation]… ordain[s] a servile insurrection in the Confederate States and says it is not misunderstood in the North or South. It is a dash of the pen to destroy four thousand millions of our property, and is as much as a bid for the slaves to rise in insurrection, with the assurance of aid from the whole military and naval power of the United States. It speaks of the cruelty of the Administration.’”



No comments:

Post a Comment