OCTOBER 1, 1862:
The
former slave-turned-Abolitionist Frederick Douglass, in his newspaper Douglass’s Monthly, writes an editorial,
making some sense of Lincoln’s strangely-structured Emancipation Proclamation:
“The careful, and we
think, the slothful deliberation which he has observed in reaching this obvious
policy, is a guarantee against retraction. But even if the temper and spirit of
the President himself were other than what they are, events greater than the
President, events which have slowly wrung this proclamation from him may be
relied on to carry him forward in the same direction. . . . No, Abraham Lincoln
will take no step backward. His word has gone out over the country and the
world, giving joy and gladness to the friends of freedom and progress wherever
those words are read, and he will stand by them, and carry them out to the
letter. If he has taught us to confide in nothing else, he has taught us to
confide in his word. . . . The President doubtless saw, as we see, that it is
not more absurd to talk about restoring the union, without hurting slavery,
than restoring the union without hurting the rebels. . . .The effect of this
paper upon the disposition of Europe will be great and increasing. It changes
the character of the war in European eyes and gives it an important principle
as an object, instead of national pride and interest. It recognizes and
declares the real nature of the contest, and places the North on the side of
justice and civilization, and the rebels on the side of robbery and barbarism.
. . .”
No comments:
Post a Comment