Wednesday, January 21, 2015

January 22, 1865---“The rain poured down all day . . ."



JANUARY 22, 1865:                    

Robert Cruikshank U.S.A., a soldier at the headquarters of the 1st Brigade, 1st Division, 20th A. C., stationed in Savannah, Georgia, writes a letter home to his wife Mary. Its brevity is no doubt reflective of his mood, as his force has expected to be marching through South Carolina but has been bogged down by storms and mud: 

“The rain poured down all day and all looked gloomy enough.”        


Monday, January 19, 2015

January 21, 1865---"The Country is all under water"



JANUARY 21, 1865:           

General William Tecumseh Sherman gripes about the weather with General James H. Wilson via correspondence:

It is time for me to be off again for Columbia, but it has been raining hard and the Country is all under water, but I will soon be off.

My route north is well inland.


January 20, 1865---"Any last words?"; The last Blockade Runners



JANUARY 20, 1865:                    

Nathaniel Marks, formerly of Company A, 4th Kentucky, C.S.A. is condemned as a guerrilla. He claims his innocence, but is shot by a firing squad in Louisville, Kentucky. 


Having taken Fort Fisher, Union forces maintain the lighthouse fire on the newly-re-renamed Federal Point. What they do not know is that the beacon is kept lit as an indicator of safe passage for blockade-runners. Today, the vessels STAG and CHARLOTTE drop anchor in New Inlet, glad to have completed their passage, and unaware of the fall of the bastion. The ships, and their cargoes, crews, and passengers are all seized as contraband of war by the United States.


January 19, 1865---Robert Todd Lincoln joins the army; "Separate State Action"; The 117th New York at Fort Fisher



JANUARY 19, 1865:           


Young Robert Todd Lincoln insists, and he has insisted for months, to be allowed to join the fighting as almost all other young men are doing. President Lincoln fears for his life, and Mary Todd Lincoln is in daily hysterics over “Robbie’s” plans, fearing she will lose a third child to combat or pestilence. Thus, to date, at a cost of great friction between them, Lincoln has pressured and bullied his son not to serve. But he can do so no longer. Too many other families have empty chairs in their homes for the Lincolns to claim such privilege. Today, the President takes pen in hand to make a request of his leading general:


 Lieut. General Grant:


 Please read and answer this letter as though I was not President, but only a friend.  My son, now in his twenty second year, having graduated at Harvard, wishes to see something of the war before it ends.  I do not wish to put him in the ranks, nor yet to give him a commission, to which those who have already served long, are better entitled, and better qualified to hold.  Could he, without embarrassment to you, or detriment to the service, go into your Military family with some nominal rank, I, and not the public, furnishing his necessary means?  If no, say so without the least hesitation, because I am as anxious, and as deeply interested, that you shall not be encumbered as you can be yourself.


 Yours truly


A.   LINCOLN



Robert Todd Lincoln serves honorably on General Grant’s staff, and is present at Appomattox Court House.



Citizens of the Confederacy are increasingly convinced that the war will end badly for the South, and so all types of last-minute schemes for peace are being floated. Jefferson Davis, who has just heard out Francis Preston Blair on the subject, is approached by the Georgia Congressional delegation. They inform him that the Confederate Congress is considering a “Convention of Sovereign States” to broker peace. This idea relies on the Southern conception of each State as “Sovereign and Independent” and it is unrealistic on many levels. Davis raises his practical objections, and says in part:


. . . The objection to separate State action which you present in your letter appears to be so conclusive as to admit no reply. The immediate and inevitable tendency of such distinct action by each State is to create discordant instead of united counsels; to suggest to our enemies the possibility of a dissolution of the Confederacy . . . the false idea that some of the States of the Confederacy are disposed to abandon their sister States and make separate terms of peace for themselves . . . once engendered among our own people . . . would be destructive of that spirit of mutual confidence and support which forms our chief reliance for success in the maintenance of our cause.


. . . If the Government of the United States is willing to make peace, it will treat for peace directly. If unwilling, it will refuse to consent to the convention of States . . .


. . . [H]ow is the difficulty resulting from the conflicting pretentious of the two belligerents in regard to several of the States to be overcome? Is it supposed that Virginia would enter into a convention with a delegation from what our enemies choose to term the "State" of "West Virginia," and thus recognize an insolent and violent dismemberment of her territory? Or would the United States consent that "West Virginia" should be deprived of her pretensions to equal rights, after having formally admitted her as a State, and allowed her to vote at a Presidential election? Who would send a delegation from Louisiana, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri? The enemy claim to hold the governments of those States, while we assert them to be members of the Confederacy . . . enough has been said to justify my conclusion that the proposal of separate State action is unwise, impracticable, and offers no prospect of good . . . 



An unnamed Union soldier of the 117th New York at Fort Fisher writes to his father:


Dear Father: 


Fort Fisher is ours and I am all right and the 117th NY was the first to mount the parapet and ours was the first flag that was planted on it . . . I will say that this, there never was and never will be any harder fighting than was done here. Our boys held one end of the parapet and the Rebs the other, and they threw grape, canister and shell. 







Friday, January 16, 2015

January 18, 1865---"What God failed to do . . . To make a soldier of Braxton Bragg."



JANUARY 18, 1865:           

The Charleston Mercury reports on the fall of Fort Fisher, which it discounts. The report reads in part:


THE LAND ATTACK ON WILMINGTON
- DEFENCE AND FALL OF FORT FISHER

Our community was much depressed yesterday by the news, which reaches here in the forenoon that Fort Fisher, the gate of the Cape Fear River, had succumbed to another tremendous combined land and naval attack by the enemy. It was currently stated that among the incidents o the disaster, 3000 of our men . . . are all reported to have been wounded . . .  We annex a detailed account of the attack from a Wilmington contemporary:

As already stated . . . the enemy suddenly appeared off our coast on Thursday night . . .  and commenced landing on Friday morning . . .  On Friday they landed a considerable force . . . 

On Friday the bombardment of Fort Fisher was heavy . . . We learn that on Saturday and yesterday the bombardment continued heavy . . . the last report we have heard is that things remain pretty much in status quo . . . the enemy force consists of seven thousand whites and four thousand negroes.

General Bragg telegraphed Sunday forenoon that all was quiet, and then there was no cause for excitement or apprehension . . . 

LATER.

At half-past six . . . (Sunday) . . .  the enemy were making a heavy assault by land and sea. The bombardment was going on furiously . . . It is reported that the enemy had succeeded in establishing a battery on the river above Fort Fisher and below Sugar Loaf, cutting off communication with the fort by water . . . The gallant defenders of Fort Fisher are passing through a terrible ordeal. God grant that they may pass through it successfully.

STILL LATER.

The following official dispatch from General Bragg has been kindly handed to us. SUGAR LOAF, JANUARY 15, 8 p.m.

The sensational reports about Fisher are entirely unfounded. Official information from General Whiting of later hour, reports enemy attack unsuccessful. Fresh troops are being sent to him, and we are confident they will hold it.

***

It should be remembered that Bragg was not present at Fort Fisher and ignored Fort Fisher’s repeated calls for reinforcement. Where this information came from, and whether Bragg simply made it up, is unknown.  Certainly, Bragg had refused to send fresh troops. Bragg’s military career and reputation, already badly dented, is ruined by the debacle. General Joseph Johnston wrote:

I know Mr. Davis thinks he can do a great many things other men would hesitate to attempt. For instance, he tried to do what God failed to do. He tried to make a soldier of Braxton Bragg . . ."

 
Bragg’s negative reputation dated back to before the Civil War, when he supposedly requisitioned powder and shell (in his capacity as a Battery Commander), passed the paperwork on (in his capacity as the Company Clerk), and then denied the requisition (in his capacity as the Company Supply Officer); having denied his own request he (as Battery Commander) then filed an appeal (as Company Clerk) against himself (as Supply Officer) to a superior officer who approved it with much head-shaking and many harsh words for Bragg. Although the story is bizarre (and probably apocryphal) it reflects the low opinion which most fellow officers held of the inflexible Bragg. Jefferson Davis, however, was one of Bragg’s few friends, and stood by him no matter what, and too often blindly.